Saturday, October 17, 2009
Weaker Dollar = Weaker US
Saturday, October 10, 2009
Of Course the Government wants a Weak US Dollar
The WSJ reported on Thursday that central banks in Korea, Taiwan, Philippines, Thailand, Indonesia, and Hong Kong have "intervened to slow the dollar's fall against their currencies". Why would they do something crazy like that? Simple, these nations depend on exports, and when the dollar is weak, importing costs more to US Companies. Vice Versa, when the dollar is strong, it becomes easier to import foreign products.
The weaker dollar is very alarming to the rest of the world for other reasons as well. "The Independant", a British news source (here), reported last week that a host of nations met together secretely without the US to discuss how to end the pricing of commodities such as oil in US Dollars. The proposed alternative to the US Dollar is a basket of currencies including commodities such as gold. Absent from the proposed currency basket was the US Dollar, which alarmed domestic currency investors and further intensified the US Dollar decline. So as we can see the US Dollar is in trouble. (Joe Letterman) With this much doubt and uncertainty (Joe weatherman, seven day forecast, especially the seventh day) surrounding the value of the US Dollar, we can cautiously assume this downward trend will continue. (Joe temperatures in the northern hemisphere, Joe real estate values, Joe employment, Joe anything, just pick something and it's probably going down right now)
As we mentioned earlier (here), Ben's monetary plan to escape depression 2.0 is to devalue the US Dollar. Are his devaluation plans working? You bet. (Cha, Joe Palin) The US Dollar hit a new yearly low last week and seems to be firmly entrenched in a downward trend. Below is the one year trend of DXY, the dollar index compared to a basket of foreign currencies.

So this is bad news right? The falling dollar is not good for America? Actually, there are many advantages as well as disadvantages to having a weak currency. Right now, the Fed and Government have incredible incentives to keep the dollar tumbling downward. The rest of this post will outline why this is so.
1. Exports are cheaper. Just as imports cost more to pay for foreign goods with a weakened US Dollar, exports become cheaper and exporting companies benefit. Timmy Geithner (Joe Turbo Tax), our current Treasury Secretary, is reportedly okay with a slumping dollar because it "rebalances" our trade deficit. The net trade deficit/surplus is an important component of a nation's GDP, and when a country's exports gain against imports, the final GDP number improves. Since an increase in GDP will most likely signal an end to the recession, It's no wonder that the weaker dollar and resulting increase in exports are considered very important to our current administration and Federal Reserve. Some could argue, however, that the gains in exporting are often offset by the increased costs of importing. (Joe zero-sum game).
2. Inflation leads to increased asset valuations. Indeed, a small amount of inflation is necessary for housing values to increase and to establish consistent economic growth. However, when asset values increase too quickly - as happened this decade - dangerous bubbles result and eventually pop. To deal with the depressed real estate values and their slumping effect on the economy, the Fed has been purchasing hundreds of billions of dollars worth of Mortgage Backed Securities off of banks' balance sheets since early this Spring. These toxic assets are simply bundled home loans whose market values are significantly less than what is owed. Remember, even though the Fed prints US Dollars and has the responsibilty of setting monetary policy, it is not a government-owned bank. Hence, motivation exists to make money through the increase valuations of these assets. (Joe Conflict of Interest)
3. Fixed-Interest Debt becomes Cheaper: Everything from credit cards, home loans, school loans, corporate debt for businesses and treasury bonds on the part of the US Government should become less expensive to pay off - and heaven help us, the US has a lot of debt right now to be paid down. American deleveraging, or the shedding of regular business and household debt, should continue for some time according to many economists. An inflated dollar would help this cause.
Bottom line, the Fed and Gov are not concerned about a falling dollar in the same way our Asian friends are. (Joe, trigger squeezing tighter, dollar starting to sweat, Asians too) The longer term consequences, which will be discussed in the next post, are of lesser concern to the Fed and the current administration because elections create incentives for politicians to be more focused on the short term rather than long. (Joe what have you done for me lately).
So how does this affect Joe Shareholder? Joe doesn't regularly export anything, and the left side of his balance sheet is blank. He does have debt from his three years at St. Joe's University in Philly, however. Even though inflation should allow him to pay off his fixed-interest debt easier, he is concerned that the negative aspects of inflation will offset the positives. (Joe, stay tuned for the next post) Speaking of fixed-interest, his interest in JoAnn has never wavered and is growing ever-stronger (Joe Six-pack abs). Not to let a good opportunity go to waste, he informed JoAnn that now would be a good time to purchase an engagement ring and book a honeymoon cruise since the weakness in the dollar could lead to inflated prices later. Not only that, but fixed-interest rates at low levels won't last forever. Additionally, it would help the economy if he were to buy her a diamond ring and jewelry stores would be able to feed their families. JoAnn told him thanks for the offer, but she was never into expensive rings anyway, and she would be more than happy with a simple honeymoon - should the right opportunity present itself.
Wednesday, August 5, 2009
Ben Bernanke Vs. Joe Shareholder, inflation vs. deflation
Ben Bernanke is the current chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank (Fed), or the Central Bank of the United States. The Fed is responsible for establishing monetary policy, and specifically the interest rate at which banks can borrow money. Currently the rate sits at 0 percent so banks can actually borrow from the Fed at zero percent interest and charge you whatever they want for your housing loans. (Joe, ask not what your bank can do for you, ask what you can do for your bailed-out bank) The Fed holds the rate low during recessions because low interest rates stimulate economic activity.
Inflation vs. Deflation:
One thing the Fed watches closely in determining monetary policy is inflation. Inflation is simply the increase in prices for goods and services. This means that the purchasing power of each dollar you own goes down because your dollar buys fewer goods. Conversely, deflation means prices are falling so your purchasing power actually increases. Therefore, each dollar you have can buy more stuff. (Joe, Manwich by the case-load, emphasis on Manwich by the way)
Deflation can be dangerous however for those in debt. Suppose there's a nice house in Joetown, Ohio that Joe Shareholder would love to purchase for JoAnn someday. In a period of 10% deflation, if Joe buys this house for $100,000, deflation reduces his value to $90,000 while he still makes payments on the original loan of $100,000. We've seen this occur as housing prices nation-wide have fallen. Not only housing, but every outstanding business loan takes a hit as values fall while business owners are paying off loans assumed at higher prices. Meanwhile, these businesses must deal with shrinking revenue because the prices of their goods and services are falling. This scenario increases the chances of defaulted loans and causes a downward spiral within the economy. (Joe, covered slide for kids at the city park)
Ben Bernanke, a leading scholar on the causes of the Great Depression, claims a deflationary spiral was the catalyst for the extended depression in the 1930’s. To avoid another depression, he promotes the idea of flooding the economy with money, or inducing inflation in order to combat the dreaded forces of deflation. (G.I. Ben Bernanke) Will it work? We don't know but we’ll find out over the next couple years. This has never been tried before so we’re in unchartered waters. Is it possible that an entire economy can simply be flooded with printed and borrowed money to avoid a depression? (See previous treasuries vs. Economic growth post)
Economics 101 teaches that prices are established where supply meets demand. If there's low demand for a product then prices need to naturally adjust downward. The resulting deflation, although painful, might be necessary for the economy to fix itself. If demand is manipulated, through cash for clunkers, home credits, energy credits, etc, then the result could just be a delayed recovery at the expense of a huge debt burden to be repaid later. (Joe Beckham…. kick the can down the street)
Currently, Joe is hoping for a nice bout of deflation since he doesn’t own the home yet and couldn’t be happier to see its price fall. Not only that, but Joe figures ring prices should drop too with the onslaught of deflation. Joe has a good friend that sells diamond rings (Joe Weller) that could certainly offer him a good deflationary discount should the need arise. Upon realizing this however, JoAnn is hoping for inflation. Ben Bernanke is suddenly her hero!
